Application uploading not yet supported in Linux client?

[Megachip]

(01-11-2014 07:00 PM)smitmartijn Wrote:  Who says it's not on the todo list? ;-)

Is there any "public" ToDo/Ideas/Requests/Milestones/etc list?

[smitmartijn]

Nope!

[Megachip]

Sorry for "reheating" this thread, but WP tracking windows binaries with no file infomations and pulsing this fine. WP linux binaries with no file information (execpt name, path and icon), why not pulsing that too?

For version information (if needed):
archlinux: pacman -Qo <binary> |grep -Po "\d+[\.?\d+]*\-?\d"

[smitmartijn]

(01-16-2014 11:46 AM)Megachip Wrote:  WP tracking windows binaries with no file infomations and pulsing this fine.

It does not, actually. It only displays it if there's another user that already uploaded the information and the server matches it on the binary. That initial information needs to be there before it accepts it.

[Megachip]

(01-16-2014 11:54 AM)smitmartijn Wrote:  It does not, actually. It only displays it if there's another user that already uploaded the information and the server matches it on the binary. That initial information needs to be there before it accepts it.

Hu? It does not except another user did it?

ATM WP works perfect for me in Windows, all apps (neither with or without file information) gets an app id. Cause some of them i'm the only one, who use it, i think i uploaded the "necessary" informations. Sure, some absolutely different apps (same name, different size, icon, path, date) gets the same id, but posisible this could be fixed/splited later.

But I think this is not the point of this discussion, here we discuss about application tracking/pulsing in linux

[Frogging101]

Has there been any progress on this? :3

[smitmartijn]

(02-10-2016 06:13 PM)Frogging101 Wrote:  Has there been any progress on this? :3

Nope..The overall number of Linux users has also deteriorated, from when this was brought up, which makes it less of a priority.